03.26.08
Posted in Economic Analysis, Oceania Cruise, Trade Policy at 12:28 pm by Administrator
It is certainly busy times for China. Flights across the Pacific remain full, despite the run-up in oil prices. Those on board the flights include businessmen and more importantly China is a burgeoning tourist destination (in fact a bargain compared to Europe in these days of the plummeting dollar).
From the airport to the port at Tianjin revealed the explosion in infrastructure spending. There were literally hundreds of apartment buildings or new factories under construction. The construction at the Tianjin airport zone continues, supplementing the dozens of existing structures.
The new apartment boom continues apace with 20 and 40 story structures rapidly going up. In the mean time, the shoddily constructed structures of the Mao era, particularly in Tianjin, are being abandoned and torn down.
The highway from Beijing to the port was chockablock with trucks carrying containers to the port for export to the US and the rest of Asia. There were almost as many trucks coming from the port. China has increasingly become an assembly location for consumer goods being designed in Korea and Japan. Both countries already have major automotive assembly operations in the country and the streets have brand names from US, Germany, Japan and Korea. (While I was Consul General in Hamburg, I had a tour at the VW factory in Wolfsburg and then VW CEO Piech underscored the growing importance of the Chinese market to their global operations.)
As we went down the highway, I was thinking about the volume of new construction and what might happen if there is a slowdown. These apartments are being built on the assumption that the economy will continue growing at a 10% growth path. There are two possible scenario for the slowdown – exports to the US fall as the US economy cools or China pulls the reins in on the economy after the Olympics. One only needs to remember the decade of the 90’s after the Japanese boom collapsed. So, how will China’s new found banking system deal with an eventual slowdown?
Sphere: Related Content
Permalink
03.14.08
Posted in Trade Policy at 4:06 am by Administrator
As the Democrat party race for the nomination has tightened, trade became a major issue in the debate. Hillary Clinton claims that the US needs to take a second look at NAFTA and negotiate a better deal. Barak Obama made similar statements while campaigning in Ohio, although an aide explained to a Canadian diplomat that the statements were just political posturing.
The bulk of the academic studies come to the conclusion that NAFTA had little impact on employment in the US and that there was a net contribution to economic growth. In fact, the greatest growth in imports came from China and the value increase in oil imports as crude prices have soared. In the traditional manufacturing areas of the mid-west, jobs have been dwindling for decades as new technologies have moved in and high-labor content has moved off-shore. Many manufacturing processes have been automated. I remember touring a Caterpillar factory in the 1990’s in which an entire line used to make transmission gears had been automated. What was surprising was not the absence of workers but the fact that the machine could consistently manufacture gears to tolerances that were 10x better than the best master lathesman could do. The sad fact is that most of these jobs would have gone in any case and the workers were caught in the middle. The frustration by the states which had lost many of these jobs without seeing new opportunities replace them focused on NAFTA. States like California which also lost manufacturing jobs were able to replace them with new jobs scarcely mention free trade arrangements.
I do think there is one issue about NAFTA and job losses that does bear discussion. Mexico opened its borders under NAFTA, particularly to agricultural products. The result was that traditional subsistence level farms in southern Mexico failed and the peasants fled to large cities in Mexico and to the US. Some studies of immigration in the US suggest that over 8 percent of the Mexican population has moved to the US in the past 15 years. Many African countries that have experienced civil conflicts have not displaced such a large percentage of their populations.
The US could have learned an important lesson from the EU with its expansions. The EU gave billions in development aid to the new entrants to build infrastructure and jobs to avoid large migrations of workers for jobs. This clearly worked with the expansion to Spain and Portugal and to a good extent with admission of the former East Bloc countries. The US should make part of its policy a determined policy to help out with economic development in Mexico and Central America to ensure that local citizens find good jobs at home where they will buy goods manufactured in the US.
Sphere: Related Content
Permalink